After Jeffery Rosen penned a curiously bad take down piece on Sotomayor questioning everything from her temperament to her intelligence to her competence that was predictably well received in the conservative blogosphere before being appropriately thrashed on the liberal side of the tracks.
Mark Hemingway at Bench Memos ran with it and called “her dumb and obnoxious.” And then the gossippy drivel just took on a life of its own to the point to with some wanting to reduce Sotomayor’s potential nomination to being another instance of an affirmative action baby that never quite makes the cut “she’s also female and Hispanic, and those are the things that count nowadays,” quipped John Derbyshire.
But then the push back came. Matthew Yglesias took Rosen to task at TP after correctly noting, “You don’t see a lot of dumb kids growing up in the South Bronx and winding up at Princeton.”
Glen Greenwald also chimed in on the smear saying “What this sorry episode reveals, yet again, is just how poisonous and destructive is the reckless use of anonymous gossip-mongers masquerading as “journalism.””
It’s far more insidious — a rumor, a feeling, a notion that the person standing in front of you who doesn’t look like you is just “dumb and obnoxious.” So you throw their resume in the “no” pile because you don’t like their name, you seat them in the back of the class, you promote another person. You just can’t really explain why. It’s… just a feeling.too
Gerard Magliocca at Concurring Opinions, says from first hand experience that found the ill-tempered charge by Rosen is utterly baseless. “With respect to appellate argument, I never saw anything but the best behavior from her, even in cases (and there were a few) where I did not agree with the position that she took or where the lawyers arguing before the panel were clueless,” said the former Second Circuit clerk. “Accordingly, the idea that she does not have an appropriate judicial temperament is absurd. I would instead describe her as politically savvy.”
Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez is convinced she can see right through all the attacks, which in her view stem from too “many Republicans continue to view American society through the shattered lens crafted during the colonization of the Americas. To them, the thought of a Latina with power is nothing short of terrifying.”
Meanwhile, Christopher Eisgruber tells us “Diversifying the court in terms of race and gender would be consistent with Obama’s principles and his Cabinet appointments. It would also be smart politics.”
But rest assured the attacks will come coming. Marc Ambinder observes all of the back and forth and finds “If Sotomayor loses control of her public image before her nomination, then liberal groups will have trouble in the months ahead.” He also added “Obama’s nominee will probably pass through the Senate fairly easily, but a discredited nominee — even though she might make it to the Court — will not.”
Hmph. We’ll see.